(PC) Chavez v. Doe 1
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8 GILBERTO CHAVEZ, 1:18-cv-01534-AWI-GSA-PC
9 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION
10 v. PROCEED ONLY AGAINST DEFENDANT
CELINA SALINAS FOR DELIBERATE
11 J. DOE #1, et al., INDIFFERENCE IN VIOLATION OF THE
EIGHTH AMENDMENT, AND THAT ALL
12 Defendants. OTHER CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE
DISMISSED
13
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN 14 DAYS
14 15 Gilberto Chavez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 16 with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 16, 2018, Plaintiff filed 17 the Complaint commencing this action at the United States District Court for the Central District 18 of California. (ECF No. 1.) On October 31, 2018, the case was transferred to this court. (ECF 19 No. 4.) 20 On February 20, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 26.) 21 The Second Amended Complaint names as defendants Rosemary Ndoh (Warden), Celina Salinas 22 (Kitchen Supervisor), and CDCR’s Medical Staff,…