(PC) Chavez v. Doe 1
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20201:18-cv-01534California546 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GILBERTO CHAVEZ, 1:18-cv-01534-AWI-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION
v. PROCEED ONLY AGAINST DEFENDANT
CELINA SALINAS FOR DELIBERATE
J. DOE #1, et al., INDIFFERENCE IN VIOLATION OF THE
EIGHTH AMENDMENT, AND THAT ALL
Defendants. OTHER CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE
DISMISSED
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN 14 DAYS
14 Gilberto Chavez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 16, 2018, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action at the United States District Court for the Central District of California. (ECF No. 1.) On October 31, 2018, the case was transferred to this court. (ECF No. 4.) On February 20, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 26.) The Second Amended Complaint names as defendants Rosemary Ndoh (Warden), Celina Salinas (Kitchen Supervisor), and CDCR’s Medical Staff,…