(PC) Rivas v. Williams

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20201:19-cv-00328California601 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 DANIEL J. RIVAS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00328-BAM (PC) 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO MODIFY THE DISCOVERY

10 v. AND SCHEDULING ORDER (ECF No. 30) 11 WILLIAMS, et al., Exhaustion Motion Deadline: December 4, 12 Defendants. 2020 13 14 Plaintiff Daniel J. Rivas (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 15 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. All parties have consented to 16 United States Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF Nos. 6, 24.) This action proceeds against 17 Defendants Williams and Garcia for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in violation 18 of the Eighth Amendment. 19 Pursuant to the Court’s July 22, 2020 Discovery and Scheduling Order, the deadline for 20 filing motions for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is October 21 22, 2020. (ECF No. 28.) 22 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ October 21, 2020 motion to modify the 23 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.