Pfeifer

(PC) Cruz v. Pfeifer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20201:20-cv-01492California867 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7

8 GUILLERMO TRUJILLO CRUZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-01492-EPG (PC) 9 O RDER DIRECTING CLERK OF Plaintiff, COURT TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT 10 JUDGE v. 11 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF NOT BE ALLOWED

12 C. PFEIFER, et al., TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

AND INSTEAD BE REQUIRED TO PAY

13 Defendant. THE FILING FEE

14 (ECF No. 1)

15 THIRTY DAY DEADLINE 16 Plaintiff, Guillermo Trujillo Cruz, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil 17 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 21, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Complaint 18 commencing this action (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or submitted an 19 application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. For the reasons 20 discussed below, the Court recommends that Plaintiff not be allowed to proceed in forma 21 pauperis and that Plaintiff instead be required to pay the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.