(PS)Ortiz

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RENE ORTIZ, No. 2:19-cv-02094-TLN-DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 MARY MARKEY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Rene Ortiz (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The 18 matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 19 On August 11, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within 30 days after service of the findings 22 and recommendations. (ECF No. 14.) The time for filing objections has expired, and no party 23 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 25 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 26 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley…