(CONSENT)Johnson

(CONSENT)Johnson v. Holy Diver Sacramento, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20202:19-cv-01773California1,613 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD JOHNSON, No. 2:19–cv–1773–CKD 12 Plaintiff, PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 13 v. 14 HOLY DIVER SACRAMENTO, LLC, and IRISH FIVE LLC, 15 16 Defendants. 17 18 READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTAINS IMPORTANT DATES THAT 19 THE COURT WILL STRICTLY ENFORCE AND WITH WHICH ALL COUNSEL AND 20 PARTIES MUST COMPLY. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER 21 MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF MONETARY AND ALL OTHER APPROPRIATE 22 SANCTIONS, INCLUDING DISMISSAL OR AN ORDER OF JUDGMENT. 23 On October 21, 2020, the Court conducted a status (pretrial scheduling) conference in this 24 matter.1 At the status conference, attorney Khushpreet Mehton appeared on behalf of Plaintiff 25 Richard Johnson, and attorney Richard Morin appeared on behalf of Defendants Holy Diver 26

27 1 After all parties consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the action was reassigned to the undersigned for all 28 further…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.