(PC) Blakeney v. Rio Consumnes Correctional Center

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20202:20-cv-01270California311 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEY BLAKENEY, No. 2:20-cv-01270-TLN-KJN 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 RIO COSUMNES CORRECTIONAL

CENTER,

15 Defendants. 16

17 18 Plaintiff Key Blakeney (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil 19 rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 20 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On September 15, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 22 which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 23 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 13.) No 24 objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. 25 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 26 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 27 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.