Frauenheim

(PC) Johnson v. Frauenheim

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20201:18-cv-01477California1,724 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 WILLIAM JOHNSON, Case No. 1:18-cv-01477-AWI-BAM (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO AMEND WITHOUT PREJUDICE

11 v. (ECF No. 36) 12 FRAUENHEIM, et al.,

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

13 Defendants. RENEWED MOTION TO AMEND WITHIN

THIRTY (30) DAYS

14

ORDER VACATING DEADLINE FOR

15 DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER COMPLAINT 16 17 Plaintiff William Johnson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against: 19 (1) Defendants Santos, Leon, Benavides, Hill, Salas, Luna, Lopez, Kennedy, Bejinez, and 20 Trinidad for excessive force; (2) Defendants Salas, Bejinez, Trinidad, and Deshazo for violation 21 of Plaintiff’s First Amendment right to free exercise of religion; (3) Defendants Deshazo, Bejinez, 22 Trinidad, and Benavides for unconstitutional conditions of confinement; (4) Defendants 23 Benavides, Bejinez, Deshazo, Hoggard, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.