Sims
(PS) Petersen v. Sims
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KYLE PETERSEN, No. 1:19-cv-00138-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, v. REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL BRIEFING
CONCERNING A STAY OF THIS ACTION
ANTHONY SIMS, JR. and NICHOLAS
TORRES,
15 Defendants. 16 This Bivens action is proceeding on Plaintiff Kyle Petersen’s (“Plaintiff”) claims that Defendants Anthony Sims, Jr. and Nicholas Torres (“Defendants”) conducted an unconstitutional warrantless search of his cellular telephones that were initially searched and seized by his parole officer. (ECF Nos. 9, 13 & 14). Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 46). One basis for Defendants’ motion to dismiss is that they are immune from liability based on qualified immunity. (ECF No. 46-1 at 10-14). Defendants argue that they properly searched the phone without a warrant under United States v. Burnette, 698 F.2d 1038, 1049 (9th Cir. 1983), because the initial search by the parole officer was constitutional and the phone remained in…