Maldonado

Maldonado v. United Health Centers of the San Joaquin Valley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20201:19-cv-00551California210 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 | PRISCILLA MALDONADO, Case No. 1:19-cv-00551-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE

12 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) 13 | UNITED HEALTH CARE CENTERS OF OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY, et al., PROCEDURE 14 Defendants. (ECF No. 31) 15 16 On October 23, 2020, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and 17 | with each party to bear its own costs and fees. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action 18 | has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 19 | 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or 29 | attorneys’ fees. 21 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 22 | case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a). 23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.