Mar

Mar v. Betts Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20201:19-cv-00786California5,632 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6 7 JOSEPH MAR, individually, and on Case No. 1:19-cv-00786-NONE-BAM 8 behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated; FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9 REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR Plaintiff, FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS AND 10 COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 11 BETTS COMPANY, et al., (Doc. No. 21) 12

13 Defendants.

14 15 On February 15, 2020, Plaintiff Joseph Mar (“Plaintiff”), individually, and on behalf of 16 other members of the general public similarly situated, filed a Motion for Final Approval of Class 17 and Collective Action Settlement. (Doc. No. 21.) The matter was referred to the undersigned 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), Local Rule 302, and the Standing Order in Light of 19 Ongoing Judicial Emergency in the Eastern District of California. (See Doc. No. 11-1.) 20 The motion came before the Court for hearing on October 16, 2020. Counsel Melissa 21 Heuther appeared by telephone on behalf of Plaintiff. Counsel Amanda Miller appeared by 22 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.