Diaz

(HC) Murphy v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20201:20-cv-01300California752 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 MONRELL D. MURPHY, Case No. 1:20-cv-01300-DAD-SAB-HC

12 Petitioner, ORDER FOR PETITIONER TO PROVIDE

EXPLANATION IN SUPPORT OF

13 v. PETITIONER’S SECOND APPLICATION

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

14 RALPH DIAZ, 15 Respondent.

16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 19 On September 3, 2020, Petitioner commenced the instant proceeding by filing a petition 20 for writ of habeas corpus in the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the 21 Eastern District of California. (ECF No. 1). On September 11, 2020, the petition was transferred 22 to this Court. (ECF No. 4). 23 On September 15, 2020, the undersigned issued findings and recommendation to deny 24 Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. The undersigned found that Petitioner is 25 financially able to pre-pay the entire $5.00 filing fee to commence this habeas action because 26 “Petitioner’s certified inmate account…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.