Lozano

(HC) Young v. Lozano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20202:20-cv-00350California2,733 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HOWARD A. YOUNG, No. 2: 20-cv-0350 TLN KJN P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER & FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 JARED LOZANO, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Introduction 18 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a petition for writ of habeas 19 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has paid the filing fee. For the reasons stated 20 herein, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed. See Rule 4, Rules Governing 21 Section 2254 Cases (“If it plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the 22 petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court, the judge must dismiss the petition…”) 23 Petitioner was convicted after a jury trial of 14 counts of: second degree burglary (Cal. 24 Penal Code §§ 459/460(b)); 14 counts of grand theft (Cal. Penal Code §§ 484/487(a)); and one 25 count of selling stolen property (Cal. Penal Code § 496(a)). Young v. Lozano, 2020 WL 26 4339372, at *1 (E.D. Cal. July 28,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.