Farhat

(PC) Hearne v. Farhat

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20202:20-cv-00557California1,537 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOHN HEARNE, No. 2:20-cv-0557 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ALEX FARHAT, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims he was purposely transferred to a prison where he had documented enemies where he was attacked and injured. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief. (ECF No. 25.) For the reasons set forth below, the court will recommend that plaintiff’s motion be denied. I. Plaintiff’s Motion Plaintiff states that he will soon be “put up for transfer” by a defendant in this action. (ECF No. 25 at 1.) He alleges correctional counselor Chavez is in charge of his classification and transfer and “he will most likely wish retribution against [plaintiff].” Plaintiff seeks to be granted a behavior override pursuant to California Code of Regulations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.