Farhat
(PC) Hearne v. Farhat
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JOHN HEARNE, No. 2:20-cv-0557 DB P 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
13 ALEX FARHAT, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims he was purposely transferred to a prison where he had 18 documented enemies where he was attacked and injured. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s 19 motion for injunctive relief. (ECF No. 25.) For the reasons set forth below, the court will 20 recommend that plaintiff’s motion be denied. 21 I. Plaintiff’s Motion 22 Plaintiff states that he will soon be “put up for transfer” by a defendant in this action. 23 (ECF No. 25 at 1.) He alleges correctional counselor Chavez is in charge of his classification and 24 transfer and “he will most likely wish retribution against [plaintiff].” Plaintiff seeks to be granted 25 a behavior override pursuant to California Code of Regulations…