Reyes-Aguilar

Reyes-Aguilar v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20201:19-cv-00403California472 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MONICA REYES-AGUILAR, No. 1:19-cv-00403-NONE-SKO 12 Plaintiffs,

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

13 v. A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS MATTER

AND CLOSE THE CASE

14 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, (Doc. 29) 15 Defendants. 16

17

18 19 On October 23, 2020, Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. filed a stipulation, signed by all 20 parties who have appeared, that this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the 21 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 29.) 22 In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A) provides as follows: 23 [A] plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for 24 summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have 25 appeared. 26 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Rule 41 thus allows the parties to dismiss an action voluntarily, after 27 service of an answer, by filing a written stipulation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.