Romero
(PC) Ayobi v. Romero
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SHAJIA AYOBI, ) Case No. 1:19-cv-00964-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S ) SECOND MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT v. ) OF COUNSEL, AND GRANTING ) REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ROMERO, ) Defendant. ) (ECF Nos. 28, 29) ) )
Plaintiff Shajia Ayobi is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel and request for an extension of time to file a dispositive motion, filed October 26, 2020. (ECF Nos. 24, 25.) Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), and the Court cannot require any attorney to represent plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Mallard v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). …