Barber

(PC) Muhammad v. Barber

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20202:19-cv-02592California324 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KWESI MUHAMMAD, No. 2:19-cv-02592-TLN-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER CHRISTINE BARBER, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Kwesi Muhammad (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, originally filed this action in the Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin, and Defendant Christine Barber (“Defendant”) removed it to this Court on December 23, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 22, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 18.) Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 19.) The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.