PG&E

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VALERO REFINING COMPANY – No. 2:17-cv-01350-TLN-JDP CALIFORNIA, a Delaware corporation, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC

15 COMPANY, California corporation, 16 Defendant. 17

18 19 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Valero Refining Company’s (“Plaintiff”) 20 Motion to Amend. (ECF No. 39.) Defendant Pacific Gas and Electric Company (“Defendant”) 21 filed an opposition. (ECF No. 40.) Plaintiff filed a reply. (ECF No. 41.) Also before the Court 22 is Plaintiff’s Motion to Enforce Deadlines. (ECF No. 63.) Defendant filed an opposition. (ECF 23 No. 64.) Plaintiff did not file a reply. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS 24 Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend and DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion to Enforce Deadlines. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 2 This case arises from an incident that occurred on May 5, 2017, when Defendant allegedly 3 caused an unexpected power outage at Plaintiff’s Benicia Refinery (the “Refinery”)…