(PC) Botts v. Corcoran State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20202:20-cv-01856California1,877 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 D’RON D. BOTTS, No. 2:20-cv-01856 TLN GGH P Petitioner, v. ORDER CORCORAN STATE PRISON, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). The Habeas Petition Petitioner is challenging a prison rules violation report and subsequent administrative sanctions. Petitioner alleges the following two claims: 1) a violation of petitioner’s Eighth Amendment based on correctional officers failure to protect petitioner after he reported his life was in danger and was subsequently attacked by inmates; and 2) a violation of petitioner’s Eighth Amendment against cruel and unusual punishment for being placed in administrative segregation from March 21, 2019 to May 30, 2019 “without merit” after the inmate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.