Haskins

(PC) Webster v. Haskins

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20201:18-cv-01640California750 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS WEBSTER, Case No. 1:18-cv-01640-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING SECOND MOTION TO

APPOINT COUNSEL

13 v. (ECF No. 57) 14 HASKINS, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Thomas Webster (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Individuals detained under 19 California Welfare Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. are civil detainees and are not prisoners 20 within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 21 (9th Cir. 2000). This action proceeds against Defendant Haskins for denial of adequate medical 22 care in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. All parties have consented to Magistrate Judge 23 jurisdiction. (ECF Nos. 22, 37.) 24 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s second motion to appoint counsel, filed October 25 26, 2020. (ECF No. 44.) In his motion, Plaintiff states that his case presents an exceptional 26 circumstance because he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.