Baer

(PC) Daniels v. Baer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20201:19-cv-01801California876 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NORMAN GERALD DANIELS III, 1:19-cv-01801-AWI-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

vs. PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO EXHAUST

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

BAER, et al., BEFORE FILING SUIT (ECF No. 1.) Defendants.

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE TO RESPOND

TO THIS ORDER

18 I. BACKGROUND Norman Gerald Daniels III (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action was initiated by civil complaint filed by Plaintiff in the Kings County Superior Court on August 19, 2019 (Case #19CV-0717). On December 23, 2019, defendants Baer, Martin, Melina, and Smith (“Defendants”) removed the case to federal court by filing a Notice of Removal of Action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441. (ECF No. 1.) It appears on the face of Plaintiff’s Complaint that …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.