(PC) Jones v. County of Sacramento

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT CHARLES JONES, No. 2:20-cv-0708 TLN DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a county detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 26, 2020, plaintiff’s complaint was screened and 19 found to be devoid of a cognizable claim. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff was then granted leave to file an 20 amended complaint, a notice of his willingness to stand on the complaint as written, or a notice of 21 voluntary dismissal. The deadline for responding to the screening order has now passed, and 22 plaintiff has not responded or sought an extension of time to do so. Plaintiff was specifically 23 informed that his failure to respond would result in the recommendation that this action be 24 dismissed for failure to obey a court order and failure to state a claim. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be…