(PC) Jones v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20202:20-cv-00708California364 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT CHARLES JONES, No. 2:20-cv-0708 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 26, 2020, plaintiff’s complaint was screened and found to be devoid of a cognizable claim. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff was then granted leave to file an amended complaint, a notice of his willingness to stand on the complaint as written, or a notice of voluntary dismissal. The deadline for responding to the screening order has now passed, and plaintiff has not responded or sought an extension of time to do so. Plaintiff was specifically informed that his failure to respond would result in the recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to obey a court order and failure to state a claim. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.