Barrera

Barrera v. City of Woodland

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20202:18-cv-00329California627 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL BARRERA, et al., No. 2:18–cv–329–JAM–KJN PS 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND

ORDER ON DISCOVERY EXTENSION

13 v. (ECF No. 40, 51) 14 CITY OF WOODLAND, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On July 22, 2020, plaintiffs’ attorney Patrick Buelna filed a motion to withdraw as 18 attorney and contemporaneous motion to extend discovery. (ECF Nos. 39, 40.) The undersigned 19 ordered all discovery stayed pending resolution of counsel’s motion to withdraw. (ECF No. 48.) 20 Relevant here, the undersigned also ordered that within 30 days of resolution of that issue, the 21 parties were to file a joint statement with the court with proposed discovery deadlines. (Id.) On 22 August 19, 2020, the district court granted counsel’s motion, and informed plaintiffs that if they 23 did not find substitute counsel, this case would be referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local 24 Rule 302(c)(21) (referring all pro se matters to a magistrate judge). (ECF No. 49.) Plaintiffs’ 25 former counsel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.