Uddin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISSAC D. DAWSON, No. 2:20-cv-0313 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND DR. UDDIN, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 By order filed July 27, 2020, plaintiff’s complaint was screened, and plaintiff was granted thirty days to inform the court as to whether he wished to proceed with the complaint as screened, to file an amended complaint or file a notice responsive to the screening order. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a district judge be assigned to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). …