Diaz
(PC) Moore v. Diaz
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 11 TERRENCE JESSE MOORE, Case No. 1:20-cv-00865-AWI-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PRO BONO v. COUNSEL, WITHOUT PREJUDICE 14 HEATHER DIAZ, (ECF No. 24)
Defendant.
17 Terrence Jesse Moore (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 26, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of pro bono counsel. (ECF No. 24). Plaintiff asks for appointment of counsel because his case was “accepted” and Defendant was served; because he has made numerous attempts to obtain an attorney; and because, due to COVID-19, he has been placed in special housing and is not allowed to leave his cell, so he has no access to the law library. Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), withdrawn in part on other grounds, 154…