Diaz

(PC) Moore v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20201:20-cv-00865California479 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 TERRENCE JESSE MOORE, Case No. 1:20-cv-00865-AWI-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PRO BONO v. COUNSEL, WITHOUT PREJUDICE 14 HEATHER DIAZ, (ECF No. 24)

Defendant.

17 Terrence Jesse Moore (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 26, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of pro bono counsel. (ECF No. 24). Plaintiff asks for appointment of counsel because his case was “accepted” and Defendant was served; because he has made numerous attempts to obtain an attorney; and because, due to COVID-19, he has been placed in special housing and is not allowed to leave his cell, so he has no access to the law library. Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), withdrawn in part on other grounds, 154…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.