(PC) Barnes v. Director, CA Department of Corrections
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES, No. 2:20-cv-00861-TLN-DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et 15 al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Antoine Deshawn Barnes (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has 19 filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a 20 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On July 1, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 22 were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings 23 and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff has filed 24 objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 8.) 25 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 26 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are…