City of West Sacramento v. R & L Business Management
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ----oo0oo---- 12 13 CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO, No. 2:18-cv-00900 WBS EFB CALIFORNIA; and PEOPLE OF THE 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 15 Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE:
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
16 v. PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON
ITS PUBLIC NUISANCE AND
17 R AND L BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, a PORTER-COLOGNE ACT CLAIMS California corporation, f/k/a 18 STOCKTON PLATING, INC., d/b/a CAPITOL PLATING INC., a/k/a 19 CAPITOL PLATING, a/k/a CAPITAL
PLATING; CAPITOL PLATING, INC.,
20 a dissolved California corporation; et al., 21 Defendants. 22
23 ----oo0oo---- 24 Plaintiffs City of West Sacramento, California and the 25 People of the State of California (collectively, “plaintiffs”) 26 brought this action to address toxic levels of soil and 27 groundwater contamination resulting from the release of hazardous 28 1 substances from a metal plating facility formerly located at 319 2 3rd Street, West Sacramento, California (the “Site”). 3 The court previously…