City of West Sacramento v. R & L Business Management

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20202:18-cv-00900California1,568 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ----oo0oo---- 12 13 CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO, No. 2:18-cv-00900 WBS EFB CALIFORNIA; and PEOPLE OF THE 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 15 Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE:

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR

16 v. PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON

ITS PUBLIC NUISANCE AND

17 R AND L BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, a PORTER-COLOGNE ACT CLAIMS California corporation, f/k/a 18 STOCKTON PLATING, INC., d/b/a CAPITOL PLATING INC., a/k/a 19 CAPITOL PLATING, a/k/a CAPITAL

PLATING; CAPITOL PLATING, INC.,

20 a dissolved California corporation; et al., 21 Defendants. 22

23 ----oo0oo---- 24 Plaintiffs City of West Sacramento, California and the 25 People of the State of California (collectively, “plaintiffs”) 26 brought this action to address toxic levels of soil and 27 groundwater contamination resulting from the release of hazardous 28 1 substances from a metal plating facility formerly located at 319 2 3rd Street, West Sacramento, California (the “Site”). 3 The court previously…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.