(PS) Murphy v. Geico Insurance Company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHANNON O. MURPHY, No. 2:20–cv–1455–JAM–KJN PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

v. GEICO INSURANCE CO., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against Defendant alleging multiple California state law claims against defendant, alleging diversity jurisdiction, and requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (See ECF Nos. 1, 2.) On July 22, 2020, the assigned district judge granted by minute order plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, and the clerk of the court sent the summons to plaintiff. (ECF No. 3, 4.) On September 14, 2020, the undersigned noted that plaintiff had failed to process the summons. Thus, the undersigned ordered that the clerk resend the service documents to plaintiff, and that “within 30 days . . . , plaintiff shall submit to the [U.S. Marshal] the necessary documents and within 10 days thereafter file a statement with the court” that…