Attinello

(PC) Fairchild-Littlefield v. Attinello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20201:19-cv-01579California4,626 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 GIGI FAIRCHILD-LITTLEFIELD, 1:19-cv-01579-NONE-GSA-PC

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE

13 vs. A CLAIM, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF No. 13.) 14 ATINELLO, et al.,

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE

15 Defendants. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

16 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 Gigi Fairchild-Littlefield (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil 19 rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 5, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint 20 commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On January 2, 2020, Plaintiff filed the First Amended 21 Complaint as a matter of course, which is now before the court for screening. 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 22 (ECF No. 13.) 23 II. SCREENING REQUIREMENT 24 The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 25 governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The 26 court must dismiss a complaint or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.