Pfeiffer

(PC) Lamon v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20201:20-cv-00896California564 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 BARRY LOUIS LAMON, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00896-AWI-SAB (PC) 9 ) Plaintiff, ) 10 ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN 11 CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

C. PFEIFFER, et.al., )

12 ) (ECF Nos. 22, 23) ) Defendants. 13 ) ) 14

15 Plaintiff Barry Louis Lamon is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 16 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 17 On October 20, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and found that 18 Plaintiff stated cognizable claims for retaliation against Defendants Jones, Moffett, Moore, Alvarez, 19 Eaker, Gonzalez, Rivera-Sierra, Ronquillo, Luna, Ramirez, Goss, Bennett-Beach and Velasco, 20 separate cognizable claims for failure to protect against Defendants Corona, Loera, Ramirez, Eaker, 21 Luna Jones, Moffett, Moore, Alvarez, Ronquillo, Luna, Rivera-Sierra…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.