Asuncion

(HC) Armstrong v. Asuncion

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20201:15-cv-01109California3,997 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRUCE ARMSTRONG, No. 1:15-cv-01109-DAD-JDP (HC) 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS IN PART, DENYING

14 DEBBIE ASUNCION, AMENDED HABEAS PETITION, AND

CLOSING THIS CASE

15 Respondent. (Doc. Nos. 17, 46) 16

17 18 Petitioner Bruce Armstrong is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel with an amended 19 petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 17.) The matter was 20 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 21 302. 22 In his amended petition, petitioner asserts the following seven claims for federal habeas 23 relief: (1) juror bias; (2) ineffective assistance of counsel due to his trial counsel’s failure to 24 move to dismiss an allegedly biased juror or move for a mistrial based thereon; (3) ineffective 25 assistance of counsel due to his trial counsel’s failure to present expert medical testimony; (4) 26 improper…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.