Pfeiffer

(PC) Cruz v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20201:20-cv-01522California1,312 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 GUILLERMO TRUJILLO CRUZ, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01522-SAB (PC) 9 ) Plaintiff, ) 10 ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO v. ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO

THIS CASE

11 C. PFEIFFER, et al., ) 12 ) ) F RI EN CD OIN MG MS E A NN DD IN R GE PC LO AM INM TE IN FFD NA OTI TO BN ES Defendants. ) ALLOWED TO PROCEED IN FORMA 13 ) PAUPERIS IN THIS ACTION 14

15 Plaintiff Guillermo Trujillo Cruz is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 16 U.S.C. § 1983. 17 Plaintiff filed the instant action on October 29, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff has not paid the 18 filing fee or submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. For 19 the reasons discussed below, the Court recommends that Plaintiff not be allowed to proceed in forma 20 pauperis and that Plaintiff instead be required to pay the filing fee if he wishes to proceed with this 21 action. 22 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.