(PC) Bonsall v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20201:19-cv-00418California881 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY BONSALL, Case No. 1:19-cv-00418-DAD-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER FOLLOWING INITIAL

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

v. (ECF No. 34) DR. KONGARA, Defendant. 16 Anthony Bonsall (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 21, 2020, the Court held an Initial Scheduling Conference (“Conference”). Plaintiff telephonically appeared on his own behalf. Counsel Kandice Jung and Deborah Wadleigh telephonically appeared on behalf of Defendant. During the Conference, and with the benefit of the scheduling conference statement provided by Defendant, the Court and the parties discussed relevant documents in this case and their possible locations. In addition to opening discovery generally, the Court ordered that certain documents that are central to the dispute be promptly produced. Therefore, in an effort to secure the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.