(PC) Bonsall v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 ANTHONY BONSALL, Case No. 1:19-cv-00418-DAD-EPG (PC)
12 Plaintiff, ORDER FOLLOWING INITIAL
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
13 v. (ECF No. 34) 14 DR. KONGARA, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Anthony Bonsall (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 21, 2020, the 19 Court held an Initial Scheduling Conference (“Conference”). Plaintiff telephonically appeared 20 on his own behalf. Counsel Kandice Jung and Deborah Wadleigh telephonically appeared on 21 behalf of Defendant. 22 During the Conference, and with the benefit of the scheduling conference statement 23 provided by Defendant, the Court and the parties discussed relevant documents in this case and 24 their possible locations. In addition to opening discovery generally, the Court ordered that 25 certain documents that are central to the dispute be promptly produced. 26 Therefore, in an effort to secure the…