Sanders

Sanders v. Deputy District Attorney V. Lai

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20201:20-cv-00690California3,829 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PHILLIP SANDERS, No. 1:20-cv-00690-NONE-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED WITH

PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT LEAVE TO

V. LAI, et al., AMEND Defendants. (ECF NO. 7) TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE

DOCKET MEMORANDUM

18 (ECF No. 8) 19 Plaintiff Phillip Sanders (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on May 18, 2020. (ECF No. 1). On July 8, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, found it did not comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, provided legal standards, and granted leave to amend. (ECF No. 4). Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint on September 9, 2020, (ECF No. 7) (“FAC”), which is now before the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.