Perez

1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAYMOND JONES, Case No. 1:19-cv-01553-NONE-JLT (PC)

12 Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS ACTION

13 v.

14-DAY DEADLINE 14 PEREZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On March 19, 2020, the Court issued a screening order directing Plaintiff to file a first 17 amended complaint curing the deficiencies in his pleading. (Doc. 14.) Although the Court granted 18 Plaintiff three extensions of time to comply with the order (Docs. 16, 19, 21), Plaintiff failed to 19 file an amended complaint within the time provided. Therefore, the Court issued an order to show 20 cause why this action should not be dismissed. (Doc. 22.) The Court cautioned Plaintiff that 21 failure to comply with the order would “result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed 22 for failure to state a claim and to obey court orders.” (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff has failed to respond to 23 the order to show cause, and the time to do so has passed. 24 The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil…