(PS) Reyes v. Kaiser Permanente
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IRVIN REYES, No. 2:19-cv-02289-KJM-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
14 KAISER PERMANENTE, MELINDA MCGHEE, and SEIU UHW UNION, (ECF No. 26) 15 Defendants. 16
17 18 Presently before the court is a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint 19 (ECF No. 19) brought by defendants Melinda McGhee and Service Employees International 20 Union, United Healthcare Workers (“SEIU UHW” or “Union).1 (ECF No. 26.) The motion was 21 taken under submission pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) (ECF No. 33), and the court has 22 considered defendants’ memorandum and declaration in support of their motion, plaintiff’s 23 response, and defendants’ reply. (ECF Nos. 27-30.) As set forth below, the undersigned 24 recommends GRANTING defendants’ motion and dismissing the claims against defendants 25 McGhee and SEIU UHW with prejudice; and, as to the remaining non-moving defendant, Kaiser 26 27 1 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, and this action is…