(PS) Reyes v. Kaiser Permanente

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20202:19-cv-02289California3,690 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IRVIN REYES, No. 2:19-cv-02289-KJM-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

KAISER PERMANENTE, MELINDA MCGHEE, and SEIU UHW UNION, (ECF No. 26) 15 Defendants.

17 Presently before the court is a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 19) brought by defendants Melinda McGhee and Service Employees International Union, United Healthcare Workers (“SEIU UHW” or “Union). (ECF No. 26.) The motion was taken under submission pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) (ECF No. 33), and the court has considered defendants’ memorandum and declaration in support of their motion, plaintiff’s response, and defendants’ reply. (ECF Nos. 27-30.) As set forth below, the undersigned recommends GRANTING defendants’ motion and dismissing the claims against defendants McGhee and SEIU UHW with prejudice; and, as to the remaining non-moving defendant, Kaiser 26 27 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, and this action is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.