Silva

(PC) Howell v. Silva

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20201:20-cv-00133California244 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KAREEM J. HOWELL, Case No. 1:20-cv-00133-DAD-JLT (PC)

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF

13 v. THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE

14 SILVA, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal on October 23, 2020. (Doc. 22.) Pursuant to 18 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), a “plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order 19 by filing … a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion 20 for summary judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Once a dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is 21 properly filed, no order of the court is necessary to effectuate dismissal; the dismissal is effective 22 automatically. Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir. 1999). 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 1 Because Plaintiff has filed a notice of dismissal, and no opposing party has filed an 2 answer or a motion for summary judgment, this action has terminated. Accordingly, the Court 3 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.