(PC) Curley v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20201:20-cv-00453California3,480 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEVIN CURLEY, 1:20-cv-00453-JLT (PC)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT A RESPONSE

13 v. (Doc. 1) 14 CHIEF DEPUTY WARDEN CLARK, et al., THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants. 16

17 Plaintiff has filed a complaint asserting constitutional claims against governmental employees 18 and/or entities. (Doc. 1.) Generally, the Court is required to screen complaints brought by inmates 19 seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 20 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised 21 claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be 22 granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. 23 § 1915A(b)(1), (2). “Notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that may have been paid, 24 the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that .…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.