Rohrdanz

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ESMELING L. BAHENA, Case No. 1:20-cv-00618-SKO (PC)

12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS

13 v.

14 D. ROHRDANZ, et al., 14-DAY DEADLINE

15 Defendants. Clerk of the Court to assign a District Judge 16 17 On September 23, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that it states 18 cognizable claims of deliberate indifference to serious medical needs against Defendants Manhas 19 and Rohrdanz but not against the remaining defendants. (Doc. 11.) The Court, therefore, directed 20 Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies in his pleading, or to notify the 21 Court that he wishes to proceed only on the claims found cognizable and to dismiss the remaining 22 claims and defendants. (Id. at 1, 8.) 23 On October 29, 2020, Plaintiff filed a notice that he wishes to proceed only on the claims 24 the “court finds cognizable.” (Doc. 14.) Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth in the Court’s 25 screening…