Lizarraga

(PS) Machado v. Lizarraga

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20202:17-cv-02430California346 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUANITA MACHADO, No. 2:17-cv-02430-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER v. J.A. LIZARRAGA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Juanita Machado (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 09, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 73.) The time for filing objections has expired, and no party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.