CDCR

(PC) Wilkins v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20202:18-cv-03163California405 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIMOTHY D. WILKINS, No. 2:18-cv-3163 KJM CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SCOTT KERNAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action that was removed from state court. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 22, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.