(PC) Windham v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20202:20-cv-00773California404 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CHARLES WINDHAM, No. 2:20-cv-0773 TLN DB P 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER 13 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 14 Defendants.

15

16 17 Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file a third amended complaint. Good 18 cause appearing, plaintiff’s request will be granted. 19 Plaintiff has also requested a limited appointment of counsel to help him prepare a third 20 amended complaint. 21 The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require 22 counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 23 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the district court may request the 24 voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 25 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). 26 The test for exceptional circumstances requires the court to evaluate the plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.