Shrum

(PC) Castellano v. Shrum

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20202:19-cv-02030California3,811 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARCHIE CASTELLANO, No. 2:19-cv-2030 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. SHRUA, et al.,1 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 2). This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Plaintiff also asks that counsel be appointed. (See ECF No. 1 at 7). For the reasons stated below, the court shall grant plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis and deny his request for the appointment of counsel. Plaintiff will also be given an opportunity to amend the complaint or, in the alternative, to proceed only on the cognizable claims identified herein.

26 It appears that the Clerk of Court’s identification of this defendant as “Shrua” on the case caption of the docket is incorrect. The court believes that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.