Cox

(PC) Cloud v. Cox

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20202:19-cv-02593California411 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOEL JAMES CLOUD, No. 2:19-cv-2593 WBS DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 COX, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 18 1983. Before the court is defendants request for clarification of the status of defendants Cox and 19 Rodriguez. This court finds that it made an error in the findings and recommendations issued 20 April 15, 2020. (ECF No. 14.) This court recommended dismissal of defendant Cox rather than 21 of defendant Rodriguez. Defendant Cox has been served and has appeared in this case, so he has 22 not been prejudiced by the error. To clarify the docket, this court will vacate its prior 23 recommendation that Cox be dismissed and recommend the dismissal of defendant Rodriguez. In 24 addition, the Clerk will be directed to correct the name of the second defendant remaining in this 25 case to Von Rader. 26 For the foregoing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.