Anna
(PS) Whitsitt v. Anna
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, No. 2:20-cv-01484-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff William J. Whitsitt (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, brings this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 22, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 3.) The time for filing objections has expired, and no objections to the findings and recommendations were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v.…