Rossi

(PC) Ruiz v. Rossi

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20202:20-cv-01066California1,258 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, No. 2:20-cv-1066 WBS DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS J. ROSSI, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims his rights were violated in connection with a rules violation report he received in June 2019. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) For the reasons set forth below, the court will recommend that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. I. In Forma Pauperis Statue The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”) permits a federal court to authorize the commencement and prosecution of any suit without prepayment of fees by a person who submits an affidavit indicating that the person is unable to pay such fees. However, [i]n no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action . . . [in forma…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.