R. Q. v. Tehachapi Unified School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 4, 20201:16-cv-01485California185 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

R.Q., by and through his guardian ad litem Case No.: 1:16-CV-01485 NONE JLT

CHRIS QUATRO,

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE

Plaintiff, COURT TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE AND v. TO CLOSE THE CASE (Doc. 104)

TEHACHAPI UNIFIED SCHOOL

DISTRICT,

Defendants.

The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice and with each side to bear their own fees and costs1. (Doc. 104) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to assign a district judge to this case and to close this action. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 4, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28 1 The Court notes that the settlement approved by the Court includes…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.