R. Q. v. Tehachapi Unified School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 4, 20201:16-cv-01485California185 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 R.Q., by and through his guardian ad litem Case No.: 1:16-CV-01485 NONE JLT

CHRIS QUATRO,

12

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE

Plaintiff, 13 COURT TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE AND v. TO CLOSE THE CASE 14 (Doc. 104)

TEHACHAPI UNIFIED SCHOOL

15 DISTRICT,

16 Defendants.

17 The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice and with each side 18 to bear their own fees and costs1. (Doc. 104) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes 19 such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San 20 Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to assign 21 a district judge to this case and to close this action. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED.

24 Dated: November 4, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26

27

28 1 The Court notes that the settlement approved by the Court includes…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.