(SS) Quintana v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 4, 20201:19-cv-00814California3,518 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALEX QUINTANA, JR., Case No. 1:19-cv-00814-DAD-EPG 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

13 v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE

GRANTED, AND THIS CASE BE

14 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social

REMANDED FOR FURTHER

Security, 15 PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS Defendant. OPINION 16 (ECF No. 15) 17

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

18

19 20 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s complaint for judicial review of an 21 unfavorable decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding his 22 application for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income. Plaintiff’s claim 23 for disability stems from his allegations that he suffers from multiple sclerosis, gout, 24 hypertension, depression, back pain, hyperlipidemia, and hyperglycemia. (A.R. 81). Plaintiff filed 25 a motion for summary judgment and remand on January 13, 2020. (ECF No. 15). 26 At a hearing on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.