Newsom

(PC) Montecastro v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 4, 20201:20-cv-00689California5,986 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HENDRIX MORENO MONTECASTRO, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00689-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO v. ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO

THIS ACTION

NEWSOM, et al., ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION ) FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO ) COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER, AND ) FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM ) FOR RELIEF ) ) (ECF Nos. 6, 7)

Plaintiff Hendrix Moreno Montecastro is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed the instant action on May 18, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On August…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.