Bentancourt

(PC) Auguste v. Bentancourt

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 5, 20201:19-cv-00336California229 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BROOKE SHAEFRON AUGUSTE, Case No. 1:19-cv-00336-NONE-SKO (PC)

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF

13 v. THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE

14 V. BETANCOURT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 The parties have filed a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of 18 Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). (Doc. 45.) The rule provides that a “plaintiff may dismiss an action 19 without a court order by filing … a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have 20 appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Once a dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is properly filed, 21 no order of the court is necessary to effectuate dismissal; the dismissal is effective automatically. 22 See Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir. 1999). 23 Because the parties have filed a stipulation of dismissal, signed by all parties or their 24 counsel of record, this case has ended. Accordingly, the Court directs the Clerk of the Court to 25 close this case. 26

IT…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.