Leal

Leal v. Muzuka

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20201:19-cv-01223California1,267 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSE RAYMUNDO LEAL, Case No. 1:19-cv-01223-DAD-BAM Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR

v. FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER

AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

P.O. MUZUKA, et al., (Doc. No. 6) Defendants.

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

12 13 Plaintiff Jose Raymundo Leal (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action on September 5, 2019. (Doc. No. 1.) On July 21, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and granted him leave to amend within thirty (30) days of service of the Court’s order. (Doc. No. 6.) Plaintiff was expressly warned that if he failed to file an amended complaint in compliance with the Court’s order, the Court would recommend dismissal of this action for failure to obey a court order and for failure to state a claim. (Id.) On July 27, 2020, the Court’s screening order was returned as undeliverable. The deadlines for Plaintiff to file…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.